Against this backdrop, China introduced an economic stimulus package, part of multifaced approach in order to boost the economic growth. It included injecting nearly 1 trillion yuan into the financial markets so that lending cost could be reducing while enhancing liquidity. In addition, there were measures to support the beleaguered property market in China that plays a crucial role in the economic health of the world’s second largest economy.
Of course, as expected, the stimulus package did the trick at the outset; the stock markets became buoyant and indices went up significantly. There were, however, misgivings about the long-term sustainability that started playing up again in the collective psyche of the investors and analysts.
As a result, the Chinese factor started weighing on the reality of the demand for crude oil in the coming months and even in the foreseeable future. The IEA singled out the demand in China that is on decline as the major factor for being downbeat about the demand of the commodity in the last quarter of this year and next year.
The OPEC+, meanwhile, by contrast, does not see the picture exactly the way the IEA sees it; although, the cartel reduced its own forecast slightly, it still hopes for an impressive recovery in 2025; the OPEC+, however, has been too cautious to restore the production cuts that it said it would do in October that has been put off until December.
In short, the IEA and OPEC+ hold diverging views that sometimes resulted in very public spats between the two; their respective positions are not just an oil drop apart! As things stand, the IEA stands more on the side of reality than the OPEC+ does.