Oil price falls again as economic worries dominate the sentiment
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
The price of crude oil fell on Monday when the markets opened for business and it has since been back on the static trend despite the substantial production cuts by the OPEC+.
Although analysts hoped that the significant crude draw announced by the API, American Petroleum Institute, on Tuesday would push the prices up, it did not materialize. Nor did the slight rise in price of LNG, liquified natural gas, boost it, as it used to do for the past few years; the price of natural gas, in fact, rose as a cold weather front is currently sweeping across the northers hemisphere that has resulted in temperatures plummeting to single digits - once again.
As of 09:15 GMT, the prices of WTI, Brent and LNG recorded $77.22, $80.77 and $2.26 respectively.
The fact that the price of crude oil defies the over-the-top price hikes predicted by some analysts, clearly shows that the persistent worries over the economic outlook casts a long shadow over the usual factors that potentially can sway the prices of the commodity; the failure to boost the oil price by the significant fall in the US crude inventories is a case in point; the US is the world's top consumer of crude oil after all and its numbers really matter as far as oil prices are concerned; they are not trivial.
The news about yet another run on a US bank, meanwhile, has left the markets jittery. The First Republic Bank has announced that it lost over $100 deposits from savers in light of the two US banks that collapsed recently - Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.
Although $30bn cash injection by its lenders calmed the markets to some extent, the persistent worries remain, leaving investors in a lurch before dispensing with their money.
Russian oil, meanwhile, appears to be flowing unhindered by man-imposed 'viscous drag' wherever it is welcome. The owners of the Indian refineries are rubbing their hands with glee as the commodity, on their watch, flows along the paths of least resistance to where it is in great need.
China is on a buying spree too. Since the world's second largest economy relies on the discounted Russian oil, its traditional suppliers in the Middle East clearly are already feeling the pinch and the latter resort to production cuts in order counter the inevitable impact.
The blow must have been amplified by the fact that three South Asian buyers have already cut down on their quotas of import from the Middle East owing to the corresponding economic troubles. Nepal, Sri Lanka and Pakistan, in this context, are in a league of their own as far as their low foreign reserves are concerned.
Since India and China so far managed to keep the threat of retaliatory Western sanctions at bay, many developing countries in other regions, especially in Africa, may be tempted to snap up Russian oil at steep discounts.
It is blatantly obvious that the world's second and third largest consumers of oil use intermediaries to get round the shipping and insurance barriers put up by the West, when it comes to transportation of oil through sea routes.
It is assumed that crude oil from Iran and Venezuela reach the markets in the same way despite the sanctions. Iran has been boasting about its steady rise in revenues from oil exports despite the heavy sanctions by the West.
All in all, the diminishing spending power of the consumers, worsened by sky-high inflation, has become a key factor that determines the price of crude oil - and its demand for that matter.
In this context, taking the US crude inventory data in isolation in order to gauge the price movements of crude oil is a meaningless statistical short-cut to misplaced complacency.
Amidst the volatility in the Middle East and the evolving concerns over the health of the global economy as a whole, the ministers of the OPEC+, OPEC countries plus Russia, are facing the same old dilemma before their next meeting - restoring the production cuts as promised in October or maintaining the status-quo. The key members of the OPEC+ are no strangers to walking a tightrope, when it comes to the crude oil production - or cuts. The changing ground realities, however, are leaving the organization between the rock and the hard place, indeed. In theory, a significant cut in oil production naturally leads to an increase in the price of the commodity, perfectly in line with the very basic law of economics - the lower the supply, the greater the demand or vice versa - that by extension, leads to a hike in oil prices in proportion to the drop in supply. In the past few months, however, the pattern has been just impulsive rather than a reliable show of consistency. In short, the prod
The loss of crude oil prices shows no sign of abating for the second successive month, defying two major factors that in theory should reverse the trend; they are the volatility in the Middle East around Israel and the suspension of oil exports from two key Libyan ports, coupled with slow production, across the country due to a dispute between two rival political groups. As of 15:00 GMT on Wednesday, the prices of WTI and Brent were at $69.57 and $72.96 respectively. The price of LNG, liquified natural gas, however, was at $2.20, perhaps in light of the onset of the fall in the northern hemisphere. The latest manufacturing data from China, the world's second largest economy, meanwhile, partially accounts for the decline in oil prices; China's key indicator that reflects the manufacturing strength, manufacturing purchasing managers index, PMI, fell again in August to 49.1, when the expected value was 49.5 for the same period. According to China's National Bureau of Statis
Saudi Arabia, whose economy relies heavily on exporting hydrocarbons, is currently facing double-headed challenge: on one hand, it has to boost revenue from selling crude oil that accounts for 70% of the former, despite the sale of the latter being on decline; on the other hand, it still has to fund the highly ambitious projects, an integral part of the Kingdom's 2030 vision. Since the twin approaches are the two sides of the same coin, Saudi Arabia has been forced to walk the tightrope, while staring into an abyss of fast-evolving challenges that lie underneath, some of which could be critical unless handled strategically. The decision by the OPEC+, OPEC plus Russia, not to reverse the production cuts, despite promising to do so in June this year, is a case in point; it was Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the organization, that was instrumental in making the decision, while overruling the obvious concerns of some members as if it was completely amicable. It goes without s